这篇文章看完，想完，练完，雅思大作文动物类可以不用再看了
2015-09-24 17:09阅读：
这是原本来自于Simon的IELTS Topic
Idea的素材。我对该书进行一个整合和编译，下面是其中的一个章节，是关于动物类的。
主要解释一下
首先是句伙，也就是论据，英文对照中文意译
然后加粗的词汇是本类相关词汇，需要你在下面的词伙练习中对应写出来（也就是一个练习）
然后是句伙练习，把上面的句伙熟悉熟悉再熟悉，然后意译成英文即可
最后是Simon关于动物类的一些范文，配合范文还有一些大作文的写作技巧，需要你思考，并改写或自己写一篇。
这本书主要解决一个问题---
就是上了考场不需要你想（thinking)，让你有源源不断的论点，你只需要根据题目进行论点筛选然后陈列即可
关于这个概念鸭圈以后还会给大家介绍
大家看看编的如何，如果好的话，我会继续把它编完。
Animal 动物类
Arguments for Animal testing
动物实验的论点
Animals are used in important scientific
research It.Is necessary to
do medical tests on new
drugs.
动物是重要的科研试验品。（有一些实验）必须使用动物作为新药的试验品。
Animal testing helps to advance medical and
scientific knowledge.Many important
medical disc
overies involved experimentation on
animals.
动物实验帮助我们提高医疗与科学水平。很多重要的医疗发现都涉及了动物实验。
Researchers aim to minimize the suffering that animals
experience.
研究人员尽量会减轻动物在动物实验中所遭受的痛苦
Testing for the
cosmetics industry is now banned in many
countries
在很多国家，化妆品动物实验已经被禁止了
Arguments against Animal Testing
反动物实验的论点
The benefits of research using animals do not justify
the suffering
caused.
用动物做实验的优点并不能替代（它们的）痛苦。
There are alternative methods of
research.
替代的研究方法。
The lives of animals should be
respected.
动物的生命应该得到尊重。
Humans have no moral right to
do experiments on animals.
人类没有道德权利进行动物实验。
Arguments for Vegetarianism 素食主义的论点
Vegetarians do not eat foods that are produced
by killing animals.Many
people choose a vegetarian diet for moral
or health
reasons.
素食主义者不吃任何被杀戮的动物。很多人选择吃素是为了道德或健康。
A healthy diet is possible without eating
meat.It is unnecessary to kill animal for
food.
一个健康的饮食很可能不需要吃肉。没有必要为了食物杀害动物。
A vegetarian diet may reduce the risk of disease
like cancer.
吃素可以减少患癌疾病风险。
Many people question the treatment of
animals in factory farms.
很多人质疑工厂化养殖场对待动物的方式。
Arguments against Vegetarianism
反素食主义的论点
Vegetarians do not eat a balanced
diet
素食主义者的营养不均衡
In many cultures,meat is the main
ingredient in traditional meals
在很多文化里，肉是传统饮食中的主要成分
Meat-eaters argue that animals are below humans
in the food chain.It is
completely natural for us to kill them for
food.
肉食主义者认为动物在食物链中是低于人类的。把动物作为食物是人类天性使然。
Our aim should be improve farming
methods.
我们的目标应该是提高动物饲养的方式。
Farms should produce organic
food.
农场应当种植有机食物。
Positives of Zoos 动物园的优点
Zoos play an important role
in wildlife
conservation.They can help to
protect endangered species.
动物园是野生动物保护重要的一环。它们可以帮助我们保护珍稀物种。
Zoos allow scientists to study animals and their
behavior.
动物园让科学家们学习动物和它们的行为
Zoos are educational, interesting and
fun.Children,in particular,enjoy learning
about animals.
动物园很有教育意义，很有趣。特别是对于儿童来说，喜欢学习关于动物的知识。
Zoos provide job opportunities.
动物园提供了工作机会
Negatives of Zoos 动物园的弊端
Zoo animals are kept in artificial
environments.They are kept
in cages or have limited
space.
动物园的动物被人工看管（不自由）。它们被饲养在笼子里，活动空间受限。
Zoo animals rely on
humans.They lose the
freedom to hunt for
food.
动物园的动物完全依赖人类。动物失去了猎取食物的自由。
They best way to save endangered species
is by protecting natural
habitats.
保护珍稀动物最好的方法是保护动物栖息的自然环境。
Some people believe that zoos are
unethical.
一些人认为动物园是不道德的。
Zoos exhibits animals with the aim of making
money.We have no right to use animals for
entertainment and profit.
动物园展览动物是为了赚钱。我们没有任何权利去用动物来娱乐或赚钱。
词伙练习
科学实验____________________ 医疗实验____________________
新药_________________
动物实验（两种说法）_______________________________________
化妆品行业________________
替代研究方法_________________________
道德权利___________________
素食主义者___________________ 素餐_______________________
健康饮食___________________
句伙练习
动物是重要的科研试验品。（有一些实验）必须使用动物作为新药的试验品。
——————————————————————————————
动物实验帮助我们提高医疗与科学水平。很多重要的医疗发现都涉及了动物实验。
————————————————————————————
动物的生命应该得到尊重。
—————————————————————————————
人类没有道德权利进行动物实验。
———————————————————————————
一个健康的饮食很可能不需要吃肉。没有必要为了食物杀害动物。
———————————————————————————
很多人质疑工厂化养殖场对待动物的方式。
—————————————————————————————
我们的目标应该是提高动物饲养的方式。
——————————————————————————————
动物园是野生动物保护重要的一环。它们可以帮助我们保护珍稀物种。
—————————————————————————————
动物园很有教育意义，很有趣。特别是对于儿童来说，喜欢学习关于动物的知识。
—————————————————————————————
动物园的动物被人工看管（不自由）。它们被饲养在笼子里，活动空间受限。
———————————————————————————————
动物园的动物完全依赖人类。动物失去了猎取食物的自由。
———————————————————————————————
保护珍稀动物最好的方法是保护动物栖息的自然环境。
————————————————————————————————
真题解析
真题解析这个部分Simon老师会带着大家一步步审题，构思文章结构，找论点，最后还会给大家一篇9分范文进行参考。这一部分需要你跟着老师的思路，不光看，还要自己动笔写（结构和论点），摘抄范文中的相关词汇。最好是关上书以后自己可以写一篇。
完全反对该怎么写？
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting
them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
第一个步骤是决定同不同意，还是部分同意。我的建议是完全不同意。我不认为这个题目我们可以选部分同意。
接下来，让我们组织一下四段的内容：
1.开头段： 题目复述（保护动物正确的），然后回答问题（完全不同意）
2.第一段理由：为什么不同意。比如说保护动物是我们的责任,动物有生活在地球上的权利
3.第二段理由：
为什么不同意。比如说我们用很多资源去保护动物，但这并不算浪费资源
4.总结段: 重复观点/总结我们的答案
OK.接下来是最重要的了：论点。你能想想第二段第三段我们能列举哪些论据吗？
给你一个开头段的范例：
开头段（话题 一般性答案）
Some people
argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild
animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely
disagree with this point of view.
总结段（重申我们的答案）
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild
animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we
can to protect them.
请注意:
开头段和总结段要短小精悍，直截了当。如果你要得高分，要在主体段两段下功夫。
下面是我的9分范文：
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century,so protecting
them is a waste of resources.To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the
protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them.
I completely disagree with this point of view.
In my opinion,it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no
place in the 21st century. I do not believe that
planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is
nothing special about this particular century that means that we
suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any
species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should
let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every
last square metre of land in order to feed or accommodate the
world`s population. There is plenty of room for us to exist side by
side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.
I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a
waste of resources.It is usually the protection of
natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild animals, and
most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for
human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb
carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed
these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our
planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation. By protecting
wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of
all life on Earth.
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild
animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we
can to protect them.
(269 words)
注意:
我已把每段中心句加下划线。你能看出每个句子都是跟问题紧密相关的吗？
双边论述题怎么分段？
Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new
medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people
argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally
wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of
them because of their benefits to humanity.Discuss both views and
give your own opinion.
以下是我的答题步骤：
首选我们需要想一些论点（ideas)。我会先写一些反对动物实验的论点。咱们在上面的句伙练习中已经熟练掌握了至少十个以上的论点了，所以脑子里应该是有话可讲的。
然后我们可以选择一下自己的观点（own
view)。看看自己写在纸上的那些论点把，同意还是反对就很清楚了。对于这个题目来说，写一个折中的观点--动物实验应该只适用于那些重要的医学实验
应该是个不错的选择。
现在我们需要组织（organise)一下我们的论点了。记住，永远都使用四段结构就可以了。不要多写一段，因为题目刚好是双边论述，你正好一边写一段。
最后，我们可以开始写（write)了。把开头段和总结段写短点。重点要放在主体的两段。
下面是我的9分范文：
It is true that medicines and other products are routinely
tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I
tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I
would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation
for the development of medicines.
On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against
animal experimentation. To use a common example of this practice,
laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness
of a new drug can be measured. Opponents of such research argue
that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of
trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected.
They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the
suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative
methods of research.
On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal
experimentation may not always be available. Supporters of the use
of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of
suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human
lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research might
feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical
treatment that had been developed through the use of animal
experimentation. Personally, I agree with the banning of animal
testing for non-medical products, but I feel that it may be a
necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures are
concerned.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban
testing on animals for vital medical research until equally
effective alternatives have been developed.
(270 words)
怎么想出源源不断的论点呢？
Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in
zoos,while others think that zoos are both entertaining and
ecologically important.Discuss both views.
以下是一些7UP词汇组成的论点。我把他们按不同的角度进行了分类。（你在上面的论点练习中应该也有所熟悉了）
动物园的优点:
从环境角度来说: Zoos play an important
role in wildlife conservation. They help to protect endangered
species. They allow scientists to study animal
behaviour.
从经济角度来说: Zoos employ large numbers
of people. They provide job opportunities and income for the local
area. The money raised can be used for conservation
projects.
从个人角度来说: Zoos are interesting,
educational and fun. They make a great day out for families.
Children learn to appreciate wildlife and nature.
动物园的缺点:
从环境角度来说: Zoos are artificial
environments. Animals lose their instinct to hunt for food. It
would be better to save endangered species by protecting their
natural habitats.
从道德角度来说: Keeping animals in cages
is unethical. We have no right to use animals for entertainment.
Zoos exhibit animals with the aim of making a profit.
从不同的角度来考虑问题是一个非常有效的帮助你写出各种论点的方法。它可以帮助你相处各种有意思的论点。我在这本书里的所有论点基本都是依靠这种方法写出来的，我也强烈建议大家用这种方法来练习。
