LE
About two years ago, I happened to be interested in prophecies and
so had a question: could any science prove that to change a future
is possible or completely impossible?
And later, I might have found a way to prove it is possible –. an
interrupted delayed choice quantum eraser experiment which is based
on the well-known delayed choice quantum eraser experiment.
This interrupted delayed choice quantum eraser experiment and my
corresponding guesses about the time of this universe are as
below.
1) About the interrupted delayed choice quantum eraser
experiment
The figure.1 is a typical illustration graph of a delayed choice
quantum eraser experiment.
Figure.1
Figure.1 is a typical illustration graph of a delayed choice
quantum eraser experiment, and the lower part of this graph is the
part surrounded by the red dash line, and for any photon pair
generated by an original photon from the light source, the signal
photon goes to the upper part and the marker photon goes to the
lower part. There are total 3 typical cases related to delayed
choice quantum eraser experiment as below.
First case is exactly as same as Figure.1 which is the typical
delayed choice quantum eraser experiment, in which the existence of
the half mirror lens BSc erases the path of the marker photon, so
there will be interference on the D0.
Second case is: removing the entire lower part from the prism PS,
we cannot get the path information of the marker photons, so there
will be interference on the D0 as well.
Third case is: removing only the BSc from the graph below, we can
know the path of the marker photon and then know which slit the
corresponding original photon passed, and so there will be NO
interference on D0.
This delayed choice quantum eraser experiment showed us the
consistency of reality between different time of this universe, but
it cannot tell whether it is between the past and the present or
between the present and the future, and also it is still in the
scope of Determinism. But I thought this experiment can be improved
to an interrupted delayed choice quantum eraser experiment as below
to show us more about real nature of time of this universe.
2) The interrupted delayed choice quantum eraser experiment
There are two versions of this interrupted delayed choice quantum
eraser experiment: a basic version and an improved version.
For both versions, supposing you have a 10ms(milliseconds) delay
after a signal photon of a pair reaches D0 and before the marker
photon of the same pair reaches PS (for all cases) or BSc ( only
when there is not the second case above included), and supposing
you need at least 1000 photons to create an interference on D0,
then you can emit 1000 photons one by one in 1ms from the light
source to BBO, and then you can do one of two sets of steps below
to complete this interrupted delayed choice quantum eraser
experiment.
For the basic version, after all the 1000 signal photons have
reached D0 and before the 1000 marker photons reach PS (or BSc),
you just need to change the lower part of Figure.1 either from the
first/second case to the third case or from the third case to the
first/second case. And thus, if this experiment succeeds, the
result of D0 will not be consistent with the lower part of
Figure.1.
For the improved version, after all the 1000 signal photons have
reached D0 and before the 1000 marker photons reach the PS (or
BSc), an automated process needs to determine in some time span
like 5ms whether the result of the 1000 signal photons on the D0 is
interference or not, and accordingly you can change the lower part
of Figure.1 according to the result of D0: if the result of D0 is
interference, you change the lower part of Figure.1 to the third
case from the first/second case, and if the result of D0 is not
interference, you change the lower part of Figure.1 to the
first/second case from the third case. And thus if this experiment
succeeds, the D0 result will not be consistent to the lower part of
Figure.1.
3) If this interrupted delayed choice quantum eraser experiment
succeeds, what could it mean?
The result of this interrupted experiment should be either that D0
result turns out to be consistent to the lower part of Figure.1 or
not. If the result of D0 finally turns out to be not consistent
with the lower part of Figure.1, it means this experiment succeeds
and thus may disclose: this universe is prebuilding its possible
future, and so this universe has a time structure with possible
future, and a possible future can interact with the present (NOW)
by a hyper-time way, and a possible future may not become reality
finally, and this universe may lose logics in reality when a
possible future that has interacted with past finally doesn't
become reality.
3.1) time structure of this universe when including the past only
in reality
The time structure of this universe may be described as Figure.2
below when including the past only in reality. In Figure.2, The NOW
interface is where we are at now in the time of this universe, and
this NOW interface is what this universe is now which includes both
certainties and uncertainties at the same time.
In Figure.2, the past in reality is the yellow cone from Big Bang
to NOW, and the possible future of NOW is the blue circular
truncated cone from NOW, and NOW is the interface between the past
in reality and the possible future of NOW. As time passes, we are
moving on the NOW from past to future in the time of this universe,
and the whole truncated cone of the possible future of NOW is
dynamically changing according to the change of NOW as well.
There is a greater degree or proportion of uncertainty in the
future than in the past and there should be different possibilities
in future and only one reality in past, so in Figure.2 the
increasing ratio of the truncated cone of the possible future of
NOW is bigger than the cone of the past in reality. The expanding
of the cone of past in reality shows the expanding of this universe
and the increase of total information in this universe over
time.
Figure.2
3.2) the whole logic tree of time structure of this universe
But Figure.2 shows only a part of the whole logic tree of the time
structure of this universe, which means that there are logics lost
in the Figure.2. So the whole logic tree of time structure of this
universe should be like a tree with lots of branches on the stem
from one end of the stem (big bang) to another end of the stem
(NOW), and the stem is the reality of this universe from Big Bang
to NOW, and the branches in the past are non-realized possible
future of past which are not and cannot become reality, and the
braches from NOW are possible future of NOW which are possible to
become reality in future.
It's a pity that my skills don't allow me to draw this whole logic
tree of time structure of this universe on computer more
accurately, so I work out Figure.3 below based on Figure.2.
Figure.3 is as same as Figure.2 except for adding the part of
'non-realized possible future of past', and this 'non-realized
possible future of past' in fact should be the sum of numerous
circular truncated cones of possible futures of past, and as the
time is passing, the whole truncated cone of possible future of NOW
is changing according to the change of NOW.
Figure.3
3.3) some rules about the hyper-time interaction between a possible
future and NOW
In reality and in all possible futures of the past and the present
of this universe, the effects of any interaction should be
consistent to the certain fixed laws/rules/principals of this
universe.
In this universe, the present reality is capable to interacting
with a possible future by a hyper-time way, and this interacting
possible future may not become reality in future, and thus the
reality of this universe may lose logistics: lose this
interaction's effects in this unrealized possible future out of
reality and only have other effects of this interaction in the
(present or future) reality of this universe.
In this universe, the past is not able to or not allowed to
change.
4) More questions and guesses
Even if this interrupted delayed choice quantum eraser experiment
succeeds, it will just bring more questions than answers, which
will just let us know how ignorant we are now. I'd like to extend
to more questions and blind guesses as below.
Q&G 1: is there an individual time structure for each
individual consciousness?
The quantum experiments seem to show that our consciousness can
interact with this universe by certainizing uncertainty to
certainty when reaching the uncertainty (including knowing), in
which 'certainize something' means 'make something certain'. So
there is such possibility that a consciousness is something special
in this universe and has its own time structure which aligns to the
time of this universe by some way of interacting or combing with
this universe, like interacting or combining with somewhere or
something of NOW of this universe to keep itself in the NOW time of
this universe?
Q&G 2: what is NOW of this universe like exactly?
The quantum experiments seem to show that in micro-cosmos only what
we observed will become certain or be certainized, and our
consciousness are reaching and certainizing only the part of NOW
and the other part of NOW keeps uncertain, and then what is NOW of
this universe like exactly? I guess that the uncertain part of NOW
is a little bit like the 'Parallel multi-universe' which somebody
suggested before, but there is no consciousness or no reaching of
consciousness in the uncertain part of NOW, and all these parallel
multi universe of the uncertainty of NOW share the exactly same one
certain part of NOW where we or our consciousness are reaching or
at, which means in the whole NOW of certainty and uncertainty there
is only one 'me'. So the Parallel multi-universe theory is wrong to
believe that there is a separate 'me'(or consciousness of me) in
each of those parallel universes.
REFERENCE
1) I leaned about the delayed choice quantum experiment from some
popular science videos, and this experiment inspired me very much,
and I must say thanks and give my great appreciation to who
designed and completed this experiment.
And also, I'd like to thank some prophets, because to be honest the
stories about their prophecies gave me the very first idea about
the time structure of this universe.
Anyway, we are in no position to choose the truth, and what we
should do only is just to find the truth.
2) I've uploaded many contents in this article to my personal blog
before, and of course I have some new contents in this article
also. The address of my personal blog is here for your reference:
http://blog.sina.com.cn/oknomad.
