Medical.Science.Is.Not.A.Sophistry(7.Blind.Or.Not.2)
2023-12-12 15:47阅读：
Medical Science Is Not A
Sophistry
( 7. Blind Or Not .2
)
So, in order to completely solve such
problems
and stop those pseudo
scholars from being
unreasonably attack on TCM （Traditional
Chinese Medicine）for a long time, we
should
return to the original intention of
medical
science as soon as possible !
FIRST, let's think about what
medical science
is.
What is medical science
?
According to '
Chencius ShuoWen Jiezi
' ,
we can see :
Medical Science is
the science to study effective
methods
to cure diseases
for
patients.
So, medical science is not just a poor
analysis
tool only for double-blind trials
!
According to this definition of medical
science,
any treatment plan, as long as it is truly
effective, regardless of
where it comes from
or whether it has undergone double-blind
trials, naturally belongs
to the treasure house
of medical knowledge !
SECOND, we should also adhere
to the first law
of medical science, and at the same time, we
should also adhere to the core principles of
medical science.
Namely to adhere to the first law of medical
science:
We should discuss science according to
facts, and
meanwhile we should discuss
medical science according to curative
effects.
And to adhere to the core principles of
medical science:
Medical science must be based on facts
,
guided by therapeutic effects and must
regard patients focus as guide and
treating diseases as its first duty .
As long as we adhere to all of these
principles
consistently, all scams will be swept out,
and
even double-blind trials cannot become a
prop to prevent effective treatment
!
Therefore, in order to completely eliminate
such shameless interference with TCM, based
on the original intention and these principls
of medical sciences, we can easily draw the
following conclusions:
Any medical plan must have clear
factual
basis and
clear therapeutic effects, which
can be proven by a large number of
facts,
patients, or perhaps double-blind
trials,
but not necessarily double-blind
trials.
--- --- This is the principle of double
clearness !
From the perspective of the development
history
of medical science, we can see
that:
The principle of double clearness is
more
important, feasible, and scientific
than
double-blind trials
!
For example, the immune method for smallpox
was developed according to this idea and not
related to double-blind trials at its very
beginning.
The same was true for the effective treatment
of two patients infected with Ebola virus in
2014.
It can be seen that the double-blind trial is
only
a later stage research work of a medical
plan.
As long as the treatment is indeed effective,
even
without undergoing double-blind trials, there
is
nothing remarkable !
Now, we can see, if someone is particularly
good
at playing with professional terminology,
intentionally avoiding the core principles of
medical science, intentionally evading the
responsibility of treating and saving
patients,
insisting on using double-blind trails to
deceive patients, and even by this way, he
insist on preventing effective
treatments in
TCM, then he is a professional fraud, and we
don't need to care about any of his word
games.
