Effectiveness.Means.Scientificity
2025-08-20 10:39阅读：
General Theory
of
Medical
Science
-------- Written by
Chencius Sino
Chapter
4
Effectiveness Means
Scientificity
For a long term, a gang of
pseudo
scholars who
always want to ruin our TCM
(Traditio
nal Chinese
Medicine) have their favorite trick,
which is
abusing science to ruin
TCM.
In this way, they can to obtain two
effects:
The first is to say 'NO' to the
scientific and
effective nature of our TCM in treating
diseases.
The second is to assault all the
persons who
believe in our TCM.
For this , those guys said:
Believing in TCM means lacking of scientific
literacy and knowledge, and so on.
It should be admitted that what those
guys have
been doing are indeed very sly, to the
extent that
for a long time, few persons are able
to beat back
their reckless behavior.
But in fact, our TCM does effectively
treat many
diseases, which has been proven by a
large number
of facts, and these facts are still
emerging and the
TV is also constantly introducing the
principles and
methods of TCM for treating
diseases.
So, faced with a large number of facts,
that gang
of
pseudo scholars
still don't how to
understand
these facts, which is enough to prove that their
own professional level is really
limited.
As we know, the reason why those guys
can be
so hysterical and rampant to ruin our
TCM for
such a long time is also because they
have a
very vague understanding of scientific
knowledge.
For example, in order to deny a large
number
of facts that our TCM can effectively
treat many
diseases, those
pseudo scholars
are particularly
adept at showing off how rich their
professional
knowledge is, as well as the systematic
and
rigorous nature of their professional
knowledge,
and then , they claim:
Anyone who believes in TCM is the man
who does not understand medical science
and even be lack of scientific knowledge
.
But in fact, it's not true at all !
So, in order to strongly beat back what
they
have said, I have thoroughly answered
almost
all questions about medical science in
the third
part of this book, and in the fourth
part, I am
going to discuss cognitive issues
related to
scientific
knowledge.
When ruining our TCM, that gang of
pseudo
scholars proudly boasted about the
richness,
systematicness and rigor of their own
professional knowledge, as if their
knowledge
was enough to negate the constantly
emerging
large number of facts !
This is enough to prove how arrogant
they are !
But actually, in the face of a large
number of
facts, they
have repeatedly performed such
foolish performance for a long time,
which
is enough to prove that they are at most
just
some specialists in medical technology.
So, they are really too far away from
medical
science, and they are even further away
from
science, and even more, they don't even
have
any scientific knowledge, although they
know
many professional
terms.
Or let's think about the following
questions:
1. Is that gang of
pseudo scholars really rich
in professional knowledge ?
Faced with a constantly emerging large
number
of facts, that gang of
pseudo scholars
have been
unable to
understand these facts for a long time
and even deny the facts.
How can their professional knowledge be
considered rich ?
Actually, the scholars with truly rich
professional
knowledge may be interested in the
constantly
emerging large number of facts,
especially those
that are temporarily
incomprehensible.
Because these incomprehensible facts
can often
enlighten their thinking, broaden their
ways of
thinking, and enrich their
problem-solving
methods, thus continuously and really
enriching
their professional
knowledge.
2. Is the professional knowledge
of those pseudo
scholars really systematic ?
Faced with a constantly emerging large
number
of facts, those
pseudo scholars
have been unable
to understand for a long time.
For their own pitiful dignities, they
simply deny
these constantly emerging large numbers
of facts
and even oppose others studying these
facts.
Now that, how can their professional
knowledge
be considered systematic ?
Actually, the scholars with truly
systematic
professional knowledge may inevitably
be
interested in the constantly emerging
large
number of facts, especially those that
are
temporarily incomprehensible.
Because these incomprehensible facts
often
give them many opportunities to improve
the systematization of their
professional
knowledge.
3. Is their professional
knowledge really
rigorous
?
Now we can solemnly warn them:
True rigor is respecting objective
facts, rational
analysis and adhering to the first law
of medical
science.
Namely :
We should discuss science
according to
objective
facts, and meanwhile, we should
discuss medical science according to
actual
curative effects .
So, true rigor is never about digging
logical
traps in theory:
In order to deny the scientific and
effective
treatment of TCM, those
pseudo scholars
have been abusing a large number of
professional terms to weave various
logical
traps, attempting to make way for their
own
poor professional knowledge by
suppressing
the constantly
emerging large number of facts
for a long time !
However, it is is a kind of farce that
only appears
when their harming our TCM by having
been long
suppressing the constantly emerging
large number
of facts to make way for their own poor
professional
knowledge .
Throughout the history of scien-tech
development,
this is extremely rare !
Strangely enough, for a long time, many
professionals have always tolerated
this
kind of misconduct and even led to
inaction !
I would like to ask some questions
quietly:
Do there be any qualified
medical scientists
here ?
And where ?
So, now let me, an illiterate person, sweep
away
the scientific illiteracy for that gang
of pseudo
scholars, and let me tell
them what scientific
knowledge is.
In fact, regarding scientific knowledge, we
should
now have the following understanding:
1. Effectiveness Is Scientific.
2. Fact is knowledge
A single fact is certainly the
starting point
of understanding, and when facts
are
gathered enough, some laws can be
discovered.
In a word, all knowledge must be
based
on facts.
3. About Meta-Knowledge:
3.1 The systematicity and
discreteness of
knowledge
3.2 The relevance of
knowledge
3.3 The Instrumentality
3.4 The limitations of personal
knowledge
3.5 The spatiotemporal
characteristics of
knowledge
3.6 Inspiration and
knowledge
3.7 Micro or macro
4. Absolute comparison can
witness
scientificity
5. Loving Science , No
Matter New Or Old.
6. Never be servant for
foreigners
7. Everyone Can Discuss Science
8. The necessary and sufficient
conditions
for scientific knowledge to play
a positive
role are that it is applied
correctly, rationally
and kindly.
In short, scientific knowledge is
a password
to the unknown world, not a prop
to deceive.
So, as long as we all have such
basic
understandings,
our TCM may no
longer encounter any scoundrels !
Actually, the gang of those guys who
always
want to ruin
TCM are at most specialists
in
medical technology, because
they do not
understand the gap between science
and
technology, they do not understand what
science is, they do not understand what
medical science is.
For example, they have never understood
a DNA law
about medical science, which is:
The combination of objective
facts and
actual
therapeutic effects is the only
DNA
double strand of medical science, which
can give birth to medical science.
Only the DNA double strand
composed
of the combination of 'objective
facts+
actual therapeutic effects' is
the only
intrinsic driving force to
develop medical
science in a rapid and
healthy way.
To this, the title of this chapter is
Effectiveness
is scientificity
Contents
------- Written on July 21,
2023
（Refer to
医学通论.第四篇.有效性就是科学性
for the original
text）
