Medical Science Is Never Sophistry
(
TCM (Traditional Chinese Medicine) can treat
many diseases
serious
large number
facts are often
新浪博客
Medical Science Is Never Sophistry
(
TCM (Traditional Chinese Medicine) can treat
many diseases
serious
large number
facts are often
ntroduced on television.
However, for a long time, some guys always
try
objective
The fundamental reason for those guys to do
such stupid things is that they are unable to
understand or interpret such objective facts
by applying their own poor professional
knowledge at all.
So, for the sake of their own professional
authority, those guys go to great lengths
to besiege TCM by piling up a lot of
professional terms, such as double-blind
trials, surrounding statistics and logical
knowledge.
It seems that as long as those guys stack
the professional terms more enough, they
In fact, for a long time, their behavior has
seriously violated a fundamental principle,
namely:
No scholar, no matter how profound his
knowledge may be, has any reason to
long-term deny a substantial number
of objective facts.
Similarly, no physician, regardless of
how
any
substantial
effective treatment
alone dismiss the practical
embedded within these facts.
It is Because that long-term denial of a
large
essentially a
In order to completely ruin TCM, those
guys
called“Scientific Analysis”to attempt
to use
academic
addicted to. .
Objectively speaking, we are in an era of
highly
indeed a very
However, in reality, we should have a clear
understanding of these extremely trendy
labels.
For example, some guys often do something
called 'Scientific Analyses' to the things
what are
often leave all
embarrassed, only because
their so-called scientific analysis is
a large number of objective facts for a long
time.
Everyone knows that scientific analysis does
require
that most people
However, it is precisely this factor that leads
to
irregular
with someone's
and even ultimately
scientific analysis, which
So, in order to quickly and effectively identify
such
to rigorously
even if these
professional
tested rationally.
Then, how should we test and even cross
disciplinary
In fact, as long as we master the following three
criteria,
simple.
1. The First Discriminant Rule To Identify
Fake Scientific Analysis
The first necessary and sufficient condition for
a scientific analysis to become a fake scientific
analysis is that such scientific analysis deliberately
denies a large number of objective facts and the
key information contained in these objective facts
for a long time.
So, when evaluating an analytical method, we first
need to check out whether the relevant objective
facts and the key information contained in these
objective facts are analyzed fairly during the
analysis
If some guy intentionally denies a large number
of objective facts and ignores the various key
information contained in these facts in his
so-called scientific analysis, then his scientific
analysis is a fake
In fact, the essence of such fake scientific analyses
is an academic fraud, so, we don't need to care
about such fake scientific analyses at all unless
someone himself voluntarily becomes an
accomplice of such academic fraud !
In addition, it should be emphasized that if for
a long time,the knowledge of a subject cannot
interpret the constantly emerging large number
of relevant objective facts, nor can it interpret
the large amount of key information contained
in these objective facts, it is enough to prove
that the knowledge of the subject is extremely
immature.
So, it is absolutely not allowed for such immature
knowledge to constantly order a large number
of objective facts to make way for such immature
knowledge itself, attempting to conceal the
structural defects of such immature knowledge
itself in this way for a long time.
Similarly, if for a long time,someone's professional
knowledge cannot interpret a large number of
relevant objective facts ,it only proves that his
own professional knowledge has structural
defects.
However, such structural defects in his own
professional
kind of right to let
facts.
In fact, in the field of medicine, if for a long
time,
interpret
facts, nor
effects
such
fragments of knowledge at the medical
technology level, and has nothing to do
with medical science.
This kind of professional knowledge can only
meet the livelihood needs of its owners
themselves, but cannot meet the health needs
of many patients.
These owners of such professional knowledge
may have great achievements and potential in
their own professional fields, but that's all.
Their such professional knowledge actually has
nothing to do with medical science.
Unfortunately, for a long time, some guys always
use the fragments of their own medical knowledge
that they can understand by themselves to
vigorously deny the effectiveness of traditional
Chinese medicine in treating diseases, in order
to maintain the authority of their own medical
knowledge. In fact, this trick is very pitiful.
The reason for it is very simple:
No medical science dares to deny a large
number of objective facts for a long time,
nor does any medical science dare to deny
the actual therapeutic effects contained in
these objective facts for a long time!
2. The Second Discriminant Rule To
Identify Fake Scientific Analysis
The second necessary and sufficient condition
for a scientific analysis to become a fake one
is that it always intentionally only analyzes
invalid cases, while tentionally ignoring a large
number of effective cases.
Specifically, if someone intentionally denies a
large number of methods that can solve practical
problems in his so-called scientific analysis,
intentionally analyzes those methods that do
not have the possibility of solving problems,
and then draws the conclusions he wants, then
his scientific analysis is a fake
and its essence is also academic fraud.
In fact, it's no need for us to care about anything
of such fake scientific analyses at all, unless
someone himself wants to degenerate into a
partner in this academic fraud !
The purpose of scientific analysis is to solve some
problems for us, at least to help us understand
these problems, rather than intentionally analyzing
invalid ways to show off individual professional
knowledge, or even intentionally forcing the
problem to loop in the circle of an unsolvable
path !
3.The Third Discriminant Rule To
Identify Fake Scientific Analysis
The third necessary and sufficient condition for
a scientific analysis to become a fake one is that
it
of effective ways into invalid ones over a long
period of time.
For example, there have been a large number
of actual cases of effective treatment of diseases
with TCM.
Some guys have found it very difficult to
completely deny all such actual effective
cases, so they simply claim that the actual
cases treated with TCM are due to the
patients' immune system playing a role,
and the cure of the disease is not related
to TCM, but rather the patient's self-healing.
For this purpose, those guys piled up a large
number of professional terms that were
enough to lead almost all the patients into
mazes so that it makes the patients feel that
whatever those guys said was very authoritative
and unquestionable
Actually, all of what those guys have done to
TCM is nothing but the preparations for academic
frauds.
In fact, if some one is addicted to fake scientific
analyses, he is using something called 'Scientific
Analysis' as a cover to try
conclusions he himself is addicted to.
And also for this purpose, he first followed the
routine of 'Drawing conclusions first, then
fabricating
facts or efficacy that he dislikes' to prove the
conclusion he wanted, and then used correct
nonsense to lure patients into thinking
incorrectly.
By this way, he could do whatever he wanted,
and everything he said seams great authority !
And even more, such a way is beneficial for him
to weave a large number of information cocoons
to deceive patients, to get
or even much project funding through such form
of deception, and at the same time, in this way he
can dress himself up as something like a scholar.
However, if such fake scientific analyses are
everywhere in medical research, it is a humiliation
to medical science, to the intelligence of medical
of research resources.
So, in order to be responsible to the patients, to
the treatment effectiveness, to medical science,
to society and
guard against this kind of fake scientific analyses
in the medical field !
（ ------ Written on December 9th, 2025 ）
“医学绝不是诡辩(
However, for a long time, some guys always
try
objective
The fundamental reason for those guys to do
such stupid things is that they are unable to
understand or interpret such objective facts
by applying their own poor professional
knowledge at all.
So, for the sake of their own professional
authority, those guys go to great lengths
to besiege TCM by piling up a lot of
professional terms, such as double-blind
trials, surrounding statistics and logical
knowledge.
It seems that as long as those guys stack
the professional terms more enough, they
In fact, for a long time, their behavior has
seriously violated a fundamental principle,
namely:
No scholar, no matter how profound his
knowledge may be, has any reason to
long-term deny a substantial number
of objective facts.
Similarly, no physician, regardless of
how
any
substantial
effective treatment
alone dismiss the practical
embedded within these facts.
It is Because that long-term denial of a
large
essentially a
In order to completely ruin TCM, those
guys
called“Scientific Analysis”to attempt
to use
academic
addicted to. .
Objectively speaking, we are in an era of
highly
indeed a very
However, in reality, we should have a clear
understanding of these extremely trendy
labels.
For example, some guys often do something
called 'Scientific Analyses' to the things
what are
often leave all
embarrassed, only because
their so-called scientific analysis is
a large number of objective facts for a long
time.
Everyone knows that scientific analysis does
require
that most people
However, it is precisely this factor that leads
to
irregular
with someone's
and even ultimately
scientific analysis, which
So, in order to quickly and effectively identify
such
to rigorously
even if these
professional
tested rationally.
Then, how should we test and even cross
disciplinary
In fact, as long as we master the following three
criteria,
simple.
1. The First Discriminant Rule To Identify
Fake Scientific Analysis
The first necessary and sufficient condition for
a scientific analysis to become a fake scientific
analysis is that such scientific analysis deliberately
denies a large number of objective facts and the
key information contained in these objective facts
for a long time.
So, when evaluating an analytical method, we first
need to check out whether the relevant objective
facts and the key information contained in these
objective facts are analyzed fairly during the
analysis
If some guy intentionally denies a large number
of objective facts and ignores the various key
information contained in these facts in his
so-called scientific analysis, then his scientific
analysis is a fake
In fact, the essence of such fake scientific analyses
is an academic fraud, so, we don't need to care
about such fake scientific analyses at all unless
someone himself voluntarily becomes an
accomplice of such academic fraud !
In addition, it should be emphasized that if for
a long time,the knowledge of a subject cannot
interpret the constantly emerging large number
of relevant objective facts, nor can it interpret
the large amount of key information contained
in these objective facts, it is enough to prove
that the knowledge of the subject is extremely
immature.
So, it is absolutely not allowed for such immature
knowledge to constantly order a large number
of objective facts to make way for such immature
knowledge itself, attempting to conceal the
structural defects of such immature knowledge
itself in this way for a long time.
Similarly, if for a long time,someone's professional
knowledge cannot interpret a large number of
relevant objective facts ,it only proves that his
own professional knowledge has structural
defects.
However, such structural defects in his own
professional
kind of right to let
facts.
In fact, in the field of medicine, if for a long
time,
interpret
facts, nor
effects
such
fragments of knowledge at the medical
technology level, and has nothing to do
with medical science.
This kind of professional knowledge can only
meet the livelihood needs of its owners
themselves, but cannot meet the health needs
of many patients.
These owners of such professional knowledge
may have great achievements and potential in
their own professional fields, but that's all.
Their such professional knowledge actually has
nothing to do with medical science.
Unfortunately, for a long time, some guys always
use the fragments of their own medical knowledge
that they can understand by themselves to
vigorously deny the effectiveness of traditional
Chinese medicine in treating diseases, in order
to maintain the authority of their own medical
knowledge. In fact, this trick is very pitiful.
The reason for it is very simple:
No medical science dares to deny a large
number of objective facts for a long time,
nor does any medical science dare to deny
the actual therapeutic effects contained in
these objective facts for a long time!
2. The Second Discriminant Rule To
Identify Fake Scientific Analysis
The second necessary and sufficient condition
for a scientific analysis to become a fake one
is that it always intentionally only analyzes
invalid cases, while tentionally ignoring a large
number of effective cases.
Specifically, if someone intentionally denies a
large number of methods that can solve practical
problems in his so-called scientific analysis,
intentionally analyzes those methods that do
not have the possibility of solving problems,
and then draws the conclusions he wants, then
his scientific analysis is a fake
and its essence is also academic fraud.
In fact, it's no need for us to care about anything
of such fake scientific analyses at all, unless
someone himself wants to degenerate into a
partner in this academic fraud !
The purpose of scientific analysis is to solve some
problems for us, at least to help us understand
these problems, rather than intentionally analyzing
invalid ways to show off individual professional
knowledge, or even intentionally forcing the
problem to loop in the circle of an unsolvable
path !
3.The Third Discriminant Rule To
Identify Fake Scientific Analysis
The third necessary and sufficient condition for
a scientific analysis to become a fake one is that
it
of effective ways into invalid ones over a long
period of time.
For example, there have been a large number
of actual cases of effective treatment of diseases
with TCM.
Some guys have found it very difficult to
completely deny all such actual effective
cases, so they simply claim that the actual
cases treated with TCM are due to the
patients' immune system playing a role,
and the cure of the disease is not related
to TCM, but rather the patient's self-healing.
For this purpose, those guys piled up a large
number of professional terms that were
enough to lead almost all the patients into
mazes so that it makes the patients feel that
whatever those guys said was very authoritative
and unquestionable
Actually, all of what those guys have done to
TCM is nothing but the preparations for academic
frauds.
In fact, if some one is addicted to fake scientific
analyses, he is using something called 'Scientific
Analysis' as a cover to try
conclusions he himself is addicted to.
And also for this purpose, he first followed the
routine of 'Drawing conclusions first, then
fabricating
facts or efficacy that he dislikes' to prove the
conclusion he wanted, and then used correct
nonsense to lure patients into thinking
incorrectly.
By this way, he could do whatever he wanted,
and everything he said seams great authority !
And even more, such a way is beneficial for him
to weave a large number of information cocoons
to deceive patients, to get
or even much project funding through such form
of deception, and at the same time, in this way he
can dress himself up as something like a scholar.
However, if such fake scientific analyses are
everywhere in medical research, it is a humiliation
to medical science, to the intelligence of medical
of research resources.
So, in order to be responsible to the patients, to
the treatment effectiveness, to medical science,
to society and
guard against this kind of fake scientific analyses
in the medical field !
（ ------ Written on December 9th, 2025 ）
“医学绝不是诡辩(