新浪博客

(Traditional Chinese Medicine) can effectively
treat many diseases, including many very serious
ones, which has been proven by a large number
of objective facts.


These objective facts are constantly introduced on
television, and the principles and methods of TCM
treatment are also constantly popularized on
television.


Unfortunately, TCM always encounters internal
demons, who are essentially a gang of pseudo
scholars.


Those pseudo scholars have long denied a
large number of objective facts about the
effective treatment of diseases by TCM,
denied the actual therapeutic effects
contained in these objective facts and
ignored the helplessness and pain of similar
patients.


In order to completely negate the effectiveness
and scientificity of TCM in treating diseases,
those pseudo scholars have been beating up
TCM for a long time without any restraint!


Because those pseudo scholars are very skillful
at abusing a large number of professional terms
to disguise themselves while their besieging TCM,
almost all people have long felt helpless about
their such reckless behavior.


In fact, their such tricks are very childish and
easily recognizable.




Now, let's give an analogy:




Perhaps we don't know how to play basketball
and what the basketball rules mean, so watching
a basketball game is just a pastime for us.


However, if someone with nunchucks comes on
the court to play basketball, then he should
be banned from playing basketball !


It is particularly noteworthy that if a basketball
referee also believes that playing basketball
can be done with nunchucks, then either the
referee is unqualified or there is a problem
with the rules.




Similarly, in medical discussions, it is not
difficult to find that when it comes to TCM,
those pseudo scholars always make
particular nunchucks to ruin TCM:




Section 1: Never admit any fact that TCM
can treat diseases effectively.

Section 2: Completely negate any scientific
and effective nature of TCM's Theory.




Therefore, as the second chapter of this book,
this chapter particularly addresses the first
part of the nunchakus used by those pseudo
scholars to find out why those pseudo
scholars absolutely refuse to acknowledge
any objective facts that TCM can treat diseases
effectively.


That gang of pseudo scholars who always
want to ruin TCM already have a set of tricks
to destroy TCM .


For example, one common trick those pseudo
scholars use to ruin TCM is the following:


Those guys first try their most to deny all
objective facts about the effective treatment
of diseases by TCM.


If it is impossible for them to deny all the
objective facts, they describe all the large
number of such objective facts as 'Individual
Cases', 'Anecdotes', or 'Personal Skills ',
and even conclude that all these objective
facts are meaningless in proving the efficacy
and are all ' Efficacy Hallucinations '.




It should be admitted that the tricks used by
those pseudo scholars are still very highly
deceptive, to the point where few persons
still know how to destroy their scams.


But in fact, it is their such trick that tells
us their mendacious essence!


As long as we adhere to the first law of
medical science, namely:




We should discuss scientific problems

according to objective facts, and

meanwhile, we should discuss medical

issues according to curative effects .




Then we can easily discover their mendacious
essence!


To see their mendacious essence, maybe we
can ask a question now:


What is medical science?




What is medical science ?


According to ' Chencius ShuoWen Jiezi ' ,

it can be inferred that “Medical Science

is the science to study the principles

and effective methods of preventing

and curing various diseases .”




Based on this, we can sternly ask those
pseudo scholars some questions :


Whenever you talk about any objective
fact that TCM effectively treats diseases,
you always completely deny the fact!



Could you tell us what medical science

could discuss any medical issue without

considering any objective facts nor any

actual therapeutic effects and logic

contained in these objective facts?




Is medical science really yous own grocery

store where you can sell whatever you want

to, such as foot wash basins or even toilet

lids ?




We can also ask those guys the following
questions sternly:




Even if the objective fact that a certain

traditional Chinese medicine is effective

in treating diseases is indeed an individual

case, is this objective fact really just an

illusion of therapeutic effect and

meaningless?




Then,




What kind of medical technology is born

advanced, without anyone 's considering

any individual case as reference?




What kind of medical theory is born

advanced, without anyone 's considering

any individual case as reference?




What kind of medical standard is born

advanced, without anyone 's considering

any individual case as reference?




Is it possible to conduct a double-blind

trial for any wild thoughts even without

any reason?




Now, all of us can see that those pseudo
scholars are blatantly abusing various
professional terms to hinder the development
of medical science!


Perhaps some guys are particularly skilled
at sophistry, as they can abuse a large number
of professional terms to deny the numerous
facts that TCM can effectively treat many
diseases.


For it, they try their most to turn many facts
into a few ones and then turn these few facts
into none at last.


In fact, their behavior is a typical academic
fraud.


As patients or potential patients, we must
not fall in the traps of their such frauds,
for their such academic frauds have nothing
to do with any medical science, any patient
or any actual therapeutic efficacy.


From this, it can be seen that how a person
views a large number of objective facts of
the effective treatment of diseases with
TCM not only test whether he lacks scientific
literacy, but also test whether he lacks
education!


As we know, it is understandable that people
are not interested in, understand or deny
certain facts.


However, if someone intentionally negates
a large number of objective facts for a long
time, he must have at least the following
two serious shortcomings:




1. This person lacks scientific literacy


Because anyone's true scientific literacy
is to observe and study objective facts
carefully.


True scientific literacy is not just about
memorizing papers, molecular formulas
or foreign language words!


Because almost any robot has such basic
functions.




2. This person is dishonest


their character issues and upbringing issues
tell us he is dishonest.


The reason is also very simple:




The behavior of research should be

something seeming as researching

at least.




If someone wants to deny the constantly
emerging large number of facts, then he
is not researching, he is playing tricks
and preparing to deceive others !


So, we must now adhere to the following
three principles:






1. Anyone, even if he got some professional

diplomas and extensive knowledge, he

should not maliciously deny the constantly

emerging large number of facts for a long

time!




At the same time, he should not oppose

others' studying such objective facts!






2. Anyone, even if he got rich clinical

skills, he should not maliciously deny the

numerous facts that TCM treat diseases

effectively, for a long time!




At the same time, he should not oppose

others studying such objective facts and

the actual therapeutic effects contained

in these objective facts !






3. Anyone, even if he has extremely rich

logical knowledge and can always connect

unrelated things and achieve logical

consistency, he should not use his logical

knowledge to maliciously deny the

numerous facts about the effective

treatment of diseases by TCM that

continue to emerge for a long time!




He should not use logical knowledge to

maliciously deny the actual therapeutic

effects contained in these objective facts

for a long time either!




At the same time, he should not use logical

knowledge to oppose others studying

these objective facts and the actual

therapeutic effects contained in them!






In fact, the question of why those pseudo
scholars have long and maliciously
slandered TCM is not so simple:


Most of those guys have strong professional
backgrounds and they often consider
themselves to have got scientific literacy.


How could those guys not understand the
relationship between objective facts and
evidences?


How can they not understand the importance
of objective facts in the development of
medical science?


How can they not understand the importance
of actual therapeutic effects for the
development of medical science?


What reason do those guys have to pretend
to be kindergarten children, as if they don't
understand anything?


Just because they cannot understand the large
number of objective facts about the effective
treatment of diseases with TCM, or just because
they dislike such objective facts, those guys
have long denied all of such objective facts.


This is extremely malicious academic fraud !


Regarding such an academic fraud, there are
three points to be wary of




1. The common trick of such an academic

fraud is to use correct nonsense for a long

time to lure others into wrong thinking.




2. The purpose of such an academic fraud

is to maintain the authority of those pseudo

scholars in their own professional paranoia.




3. The harm of such an academic fraud lies

in its disregard for the health needs and

survival intentions of many patients.






So, an extremely convenient and effective way
to correct those pseudo scholars who always
want to ruin TCM is to let them first correct
their academic attitude, learn to respect facts,
learn scientific thinking, and also learn to
apply medical and logical knowledge correctly,
rationally and in good faith.


For this, it is necessary to keep in mind a
scientific common sense:


Objective facts are evidences!






Therefore, the theme of the second chapter is




'Objective facts are evidences!'







Chapter 2

Objective Facts

Are Evidences



Contents




2.1
Objective Facts Are Evidence
2.2
Anecdotes Are Also Very Important
2.3
Individual Cases Are Also Very Important
2.4
How About Isolated Evidence ?







( ------ Written on June 17, 2023

Revised on February 12, 2026




[ Refer to 客观事实就是证据!
for the original text ]

我的更多文章

下载客户端阅读体验更佳

APP专享