Converb
2022-04-29 20:52阅读:
链接
Converb
Jump
to navigationJump to
search A
converb is a non-finite verb form
that serves to express
adverbial
subordination, i.e.
notions like 'when', 'because', 'after', 'while'.
Examples
(1) Russian (Weiss 1995:259)
Okonchiv desjatiletku, ja osen'ju byl prizvan v
Armiju.
'Having finished ten years of school, in autumn I was drafted into
the Army.'
(2) Italian (Pusch
1980:107)
C'è una donna che guadagna danaro accompagnando nuovi
membri.
'There's a woman who earns money by accompanying new
members.'
Comments
The notion
adverbial in the definition is
relatively vague.
Adverbial subordinate clause
primarily contrasts with
relative clause and
complement clause. Non-finite verb forms
that serve to express relative clauses are often called
participle, and non-finite verb forms that
serve to express complement clauses are often called
infinitive,
masdar or
nominalization. The notion 'non-finite' in the
definition is problematic and arguably
Indo-European-centered.
Subtypes
narrative vs.
specialized
converb (Nedjalkov 1995)
Polysemy
None.
Synonyms
Origin
The term converb was coined by Ramstedt (1903:55) for Mongolian and
until recently was mostly used by specialists of Mongolic and
Turkic languages. Nedjalkov & Nedjalkov (1987) first adopted
the term for general typological use, followed by Haspelmath &
König (1995).
References
- ');'>
- Bickel, B. 1998. ‘Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective’
[Review article on Haspelmath & König (eds.) 1995.]
Linguistic Typology 2. 381-397.
- ');'>
- Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. ‘The converb as a
cross-linguistically valid category’. In Haspelmath, M. & E.
König
(eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective . 1-55. Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter.
- ');'>
- Haspelmath, M. 1999. ‘Converbs’. In Brown K. & J. Miller
(eds.), Concise encyclopedia of grammatical
categories . 110-115. Oxford
: Elsevier.
- ');'>
- König, E. 1995. ‘The meaning of converb constructions’. In
Haspelmath, M. & E. König (eds.), Converbs in
cross-linguistic perspective . 57-96. Berlin: Mouton de
Gruyter.
- ');'>
- Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 1990. 'Osnovnye tipy deepricastij.' In:
Xrakovskij, Viktor S. (ed.) Tipologija i grammatika.
Moskva: Nauka, 36-59.
- Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 1995. ‘Some typological parameters of
converbs’. In Haspelmath, M. & E. König (eds.), Converbs
in cross-linguistic perspective . 97-136. Berlin: Mouton de
Gruyter.
- ');'>
- Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Nedjalkov, Igor’ V. 1987. 'On the
typological characteristics of converbs.' In: Toomas Help (ed.)
Symposium on language universals. Tallinn,
75-79.
- Noonan, Michael. 1999. ‘Converbal constructions in Chantyal’.
In Yadava, Y. & W. Glover (eds.), Topics in Nepalese
linguistics . Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.
- ');'>
- Pusch, Luise. 1980. ...
- Tikkanen, Bertil. 2001. ‘Converbs’. In Haspelmath, M., E.
König, W. Österreicher & W. Raible (eds.).
Language
typology and language universals
. Volume 2 . 1112-1123. Berlin
: Mouton de Gruyter
- ');'>
- van der Auwera, J. 1998. ‘Defining converbs’. In Kulikov, L.
& H. Vater (eds.), Typology of the verbal
categories: Papers presented to Vladimir Nedjalkov on the occasion
of his 70th birthday
. 273-282. Tübingen: Max
Niemeyer Verlag.
- ');'>
- Ylikoski, J. 2003. ‘Defining non-finites: action nominals,
converbs and infinitives’. SKY Journal of Linguistics
16. 185-237.
- Weiss, Daniel. 1995. 'Russian converbs: a typological outline.'
In: Haspelmath, Martin & König, Ekkehard (eds.) 1995.
Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective.
Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 239-282.
Other languages